விக்கிப்பீடியா:தனிநபர் விமர்சனங்களைத் தவிர்த்தல்

[தொகு] வேண்டாம்

Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Nobody likes abuse.

[தொகு] விளைவுகள்

Many Wikipedians remove personal attacks on sight, and although this isn't policy it's often seen as an appropriate reaction to extreme personal abuse. Users have been banned for repeatedly engaging in personal attacks. Abusive edit summaries are particularly ill-regarded.

[தொகு] Ramifications

Remember that disputes on talk pages are accessible to everyone on the Internet. The way in which you conduct yourself on Wikipedia reflects on Wikipedia and on you. Stay cool.

[தொகு] Being reasonable

Different contributors may not agree on an article. Members of opposing communities reasonably wish to express their views. Synthesising these views into a single article creates a better, more NPOV article for everyone. Remember to accept that we are all part of the same community as we are all Wikipedians.

[தொகு] So, don't do it!

There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them.

[தொகு] Examples

Specific examples of personal attack include but are not limited to:

• Negative personal comments and "I'm better than you" attacks, such as "You have no life."
• Racial, sexual, homophobic, religious or ethnic epithets directed against another contributor. Religious epithets are not allowed even if the contributor is a member of a purported cult.
• Political affiliation attacks, such as calling someone a Nazi
• Profanity directed against another contributor.
• Threats of legal action
• Death threats.
• Threats or actions which expose other Wikipedia editors to political, religious or other persecution by government, their employer or any others. Violations of this sort may result in a block for an extended period of time which may be applied immediately by any sysop upon discovery. Sysops applying such sanctions should confidentially notify the members of the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee and Jimbo Wales of what they have done and why.

[தொகு] Alternatives

Instead, try:

• Discuss the facts and how to express them, not the attributes of the other party. This does not mean that you have to agree with the other person, but just agree to disagree.
• Never suggest a view is invalid simply because of who its proponent is.
• Explore issues in a less public forum like e-mail if a debate threatens to become personal.
• Read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

[தொகு] Remedies

If you are personally attacked, you may remove the attacks or may follow the dispute resolution process or both. In extreme cases, the attacker may be blocked, though the proposal to allow this failed and the practice is almost always controversial.

[தொகு] A misguided notion: "Kicking them while they are down"

Note: There are certain Wikipedia users who are unpopular, perhaps because of foolish or boorish behavior in the past. Such users may have been subject to disciplinary actions by the Arbitration Committee. It is only human to imagine that such users might be fair game for personal attacks. This notion is misguided.

[தொகு] Community spirit

It is your responsibility to foster and maintain a positive online community in Wikipedia. Personal attacks against any user - regardless of his/her past behaviour - is contrary to this spirit.

[தொகு] கொள்கைமாற்றப் பரிந்துரைகள்

[[விக்கிபீடியா பேச்சு:தனிநபர் விமர்சனங்களைத் தவிர்த்தல்

|பேச்சுப் பக்கத்தில்]]

வார்ப்புரு:Spoken Wikipedia