|
|
Wikipedia:Ambassade/Wikipedia-l
Dette er en e-post om sprÄksituasjonen i det norske wikipediamiljÞet som skal postes til Wikipedia-l. Rediger gjerne, og alle, bÄde administratorer og andre brukere, inviteres til Ä skrive under. BjarteSorensen sender mailen av gÄrde tidlig mandag ettermiddag sent mandag kveld (25. april) norsk tid. (Da er den sendt! :) Mandag 25. april, 23:50 norsk tid. Bjarte 25. apr 2005 kl.21:52 (UTC))
Dear all,
Most of you would be aware of some of the discussions that have occurred
around Wikipedia in the Norwegian languages. Since the last round of
discussions on this list, there has been a lot of internal debate, as
well as what seems to be a fairly widely accepted agreement following
voting.
This e-mail intends to, after a brief recap on Norwegian language and
wikipedia issues, take those interested through the latest development
and will stake out the road ahead. It is also intended to inform the
international community about the current agreement on no.wikipedia, so
as to prevent misunderstandings in the future.
Finally, we will mention an unfortunate reaction to the vote by a small
number of users at the Norwegian BokmÄl/RiksmÄl (no:) wikipedia who want
to disregard the result of the voting and are planning to create a
_third_ Norwegian wikipedia with the sole mission of mixing the contents
of the two current Norwegian versions.
== A short language history of Norway ==
Spoken Norwegian ("norsk") (ISO 639-2 alpha-2 code "no") is in a fairly
unique situation compared to most other languages of the world in that
it has two widely accepted written standards, BokmÄl (ISO 639-2 alpha-2
code "nb") and Nynorsk (ISO 639-2 alpha-2 code "nn"). By national
legislation they are both regarded as official written forms of
Norwegian. In addition, many people still make a distinction between
BokmÄl and its precursor which still is in use, RiksmÄl.
Briefly speaking, BokmÄl and RiksmÄl are descendants of the Danish
written language. Until the 1800s, Danish was the only widely used
written language in Norway as a result of four centuries of union with
Denmark. With increasing independence came a wish to norwegianise the
Danish standard, with Knud Knudsen at the forefront for changing parts
of the vocabulary and orthographics. Thus, RiksmÄl, and later BokmÄl,
resulted. These forms together are today probably used by about 90% of
Norway's population, or somewhere around 3,500,000 people.
Parallel to this development, a new written standard was created by Ivar
Aasen. He travelled extensively throughout Norway, and based his new
language, landsmÄl, on the grammar and vocabulary of dialect samples
from around the country. This was later renamed Nynorsk. Modern Nynorsk
differs significantly from modern BokmÄl, and may be linguistically
looked upon as as different (or as similar if you like) as Swedish is to
Danish. For English or Dutch/German speakers, the differences may be
likened to those between (Lowland) Scots and English or Low German and
Dutch. Today it is estimated that about 500,000-600,000 people have
Nynorsk as their first written language.
More information about the Norwegian language history can be found in
English, German, French, Spanish or Portuguese on the website of the
Norwegian Language Council:
http://www.sprakrad.no/templates/Page.aspx?id=653
== A short history of Wikipedia in Norwegian ==
The first Norwegian wikipedia started 26 November 2001 on the subdomain
no.wikipedia.org. As most wikipedias, its contributor and article count
started really picking up around the end of 2003. At the time, it
accepted all written standards of Norwegian, although the amount of
Nynorsk was minimal. There were already several debates about the
feasibilty and appropriateness of keeping the two languages united on
one Wikipedia. On 31 July 2004 a Wikipedia for Nynorsk was created.
The creation of nn:, however, split the community at no: wikipedia. Many
felt that given that Nynorsk now had its own wikipedia, no: should
become a BokmÄl/RiksmÄl Wikipedia only. Others disapproved and claimed
that there was no need to change and that it should continue its
language policy of accepting all and keep its interwiki link name of
"Norsk".
Nynorsk Wikipedia soon proved a success, as it within the next few
months gathered several people who had felt uncomfortable in the
(mainly) BokmÄl environment at no:. The name displayed in interwiki
links became "Norsk (nynorsk)" (languages are not spelt with upper case
in Norwegian). To date it continues to be one of the fastest growing
wikipedias, with a steady article increase, now at over 6000 articles
and >50 editors with more than 10 edits since arrival.
== Votes ==
The issue of no:'s language policy has come up time and again, and a
vote was held in March ([[:no:Wikipedia:MÄlform]]) as to which policy to
adapt. Independent of the method of the tally (whether or not to include
new contributors etc.) there was a majority for switching to a
BokmÄl/RiksmÄl only language policy (50% for BokmÄl/RiksmÄl, 43.2% for
BokmÄl/RiksmÄl/Nynorsk/HÞgnorsk, and 6.8% for the official variants
BokmÄl/Nynorsk only).
Following this result, there is now going to be a vote on which
interwiki link name will most appropriately reflect the current language
policy of no:. The result of this vote will most likely be either "Norsk
(bokmÄl)" or "Norsk (bokmÄl/riksmÄl)".
Understandably, there has also been a debate as to whether the subdomain
should change from "no" to "nb", as this is the correct representation
of BokmÄl according to ISO 639-2. However, there is some resentment
towards such a move and currently a general acceptance in letting the
BokmÄl wikipedia stay at "no". The alternative some have suggested is a
server-side redirect from "no" to "nb", in the same way that "nb" today
is a server-side redirect to the equivalent page on "no".
== Summary of the problem ==
Unfortunately, a small group of users (who all write BokmÄl/RiksmÄl) are
ignoring the results from the vote, and are claiming they want to
re-establish a wikipedia for all written standards of Norwegian. They
claim they have been in touch with people centrally in Wikimedia
(developers? stewards?) and that they have so far received positive
comments. With this email, we would like to state the fact that there
have been no official decisions about creating a third Norwegian
wikipedia containing both BokmÄl and Nynorsk, it is merely an unofficial
initiative from a small group of users which started a sign-on list at
[[:no:Bruker:Norsk_Wikipedia]]. A spontaneous list with signatures
against this activity was immediately created at
[[:no:Wikipedia-diskusjon:Fellesnorsk]]. The process of creating a third
Norwegian wikipedia has not gone through a voting process in any of the
two existing Norwegian wikipedias (no: and nn:) and can not be
considered as a decision by the Norwegian Wikipedia community.
We believe the creation of a third wikipedia under the Wikimedia
foundation would have a serious and unfortunate impact on the existing
wikipedias in Norwegian, no: and nn:, and would undermine Wikipedia's
reputation in Norway. This being said, we are all for extensive co-
operation between the four Scandinavian language wikipedias (including
Swedish and Danish), as evident by the recent creation of
[[:meta:Skanwiki]], the Scandinavian meta-pages, and the use of featured
articles from neighbour wikipedias.
== Conclusion ==
Hopefully, this letter will help people better understand the
complicated language situation of the Norwegian Wikipedia community, so
as to give a background on which discussion can take place on this list
in the future, such as the inevitable debate following a possible
request for a re-establishment of the common (and third!) Norwegian
Wikipedia.
From the community of no.wikipedia.org and nn.wikipedia.org,
Bjarte SĂžrensen [[:meta:User:BjarteSorensen]] (Administrator/bureaucrat on nn:)
Lars Alvik [[:no:User:Profoss]] (Administrator/bureaucrat on no:)
Ăyvind A. Holm [[:no:User:Sunny256]] (Administrator on no:)
Onar Vikingstad [[:no:User:Vikingstad]] (Administrator on no:)
Jon Harald SĂžby [[:no:User:Jhs]] (Administrator on no:)
Chris Nyborg [[:no:User:Cnyborg]] (Administrator on no:)
Guttorm FlatabĂž [[:no:User:Dittaeva]] (Administrator on nn:)
Gunleiv Hadland [[:meta:User:Gunnernett]] (Administrator on nn:)
Jarle Fagerheim [[:nn:User:Jarle]] (Administrator on nn:)
Ăyvind Jo Heimdal Eik [[:en:User:Pladask]] (Administrator on nn: and no:)
Kristian André Gallis [[:nn:User:Kristaga]]
Vegard WĂŠrp [[:no:User:Vegardw]]
Nina Aldin Thune [[:no:User:Nina]]
Thor-Rune Hansen [[:no:User:ThorRune]]
Claes Tande [[:no:User:Ctande]]
Arnt-Erik Krokaa [[:no:User:AEK]]
Rune Sattler [[:no:User:Shauni]]
- Var ikke her sÄ jeg fikk signert brevet fÞr det ble sendt, men jeg skriver nÄ inn navnet mitt her for Ä vise godvilje :) kurtber 28. apr 2005 kl.21:52 (UTC)
[rediger] OppfĂžlgingsinnlegg
Mark Williamson node.ue at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 00:33:19 UTC 2005
Previous message: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in the Norwegian Wikipedia community
Next message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in the NorwegianWikipedia community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bjarte,
If these people really did receive positive reactions, which I'm
doubtful they did, it's because most of the people in charge don't
like having two Wikipedias where there "could" be 1 instead. It is
seen as a tragic division of effort, and no doubt those who were
discussing it with them played down dramatically the actual
differences between BokmÄl and Nynorsk.
I also have an opinion regarding no: and nb:.
no: should be moved to nb:, and no: should redirect to nb:.
However, this should eventually be changed so that no: is a portal
containing a link to both, but there should be enough time in between
for people to get sort of used to the new URL, as there was with
"wikipedia.org" vs "en.wikipedia.org" for the English Wikipedia. As
with the English Wikipedia, however, actual article requests to no:
such as http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norge should automatically be
redirected to the BokmÄl article, with perhaps special exceptions when
the title is obviously Nynorsk.
To continue forever to use no: for BokmÄl and/or RiksmÄl is inherently
non-neutral. no: is listed in the ISO standard as "Norwegian", yet if
Nynorsk is disallowed on no: but no: remains at the current subdomain,
that means we are actually endorsing the view that "BokmÄl is the
_real_ Norwegian language".
Mark
Chris Nyborg Chris.Nyborg at katolsk.no
Tue Apr 26 08:15:35 UTC 2005
Previous message: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in the Norwegian Wikipedia community
Next message: [Wikipedia-l] Status of work and implementation on Serbian extension to MediaWiki
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org [mailto:wikipedia-l-
> bounces at Wikimedia.org] PĂ„ vegne av Mark Williamson
> Sendt: 26. april 2005 02:33
> Til: bjarte at pingpingping.com; wikipedia-l at wikimedia.org
> Emne: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in the
> NorwegianWikipedia community
>
> Bjarte,
>
> If these people really did receive positive reactions, which I'm
> doubtful they did, it's because most of the people in charge don't
> like having two Wikipedias where there "could" be 1 instead. It is
> seen as a tragic division of effort, and no doubt those who were
> discussing it with them played down dramatically the actual
> differences between BokmÄl and Nynorsk.
Seems like a good analysis; I would add that it seems likely, from what
they've written on no:, that they have misrepresented the actual
situation. They seem to labour under the misconception that having a
mixed Wikipedia means having one Norwegian Wikipedia, whereas it means
having three, thus creating a further division of effort.
Their hopes of merging Nynorsk and BokmÄl are quite misplaced, and it
seems to be obvious to most users that the losing part in such a merger
would be the Nynorsk users; their Wikipedia is the first modern
encyclopedia in Nynorsk, and thus a great step forward for the Nynorsk
community.
>
> I also have an opinion regarding no: and nb:.
>
> no: should be moved to nb:, and no: should redirect to nb:.
>
> However, this should eventually be changed so that no: is a portal
> containing a link to both, but there should be enough time in between
> for people to get sort of used to the new URL, as there was with
> "wikipedia.org" vs "en.wikipedia.org" for the English Wikipedia. As
> with the English Wikipedia, however, actual article requests to no:
> such as http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norge should automatically be
> redirected to the BokmÄl article, with perhaps special exceptions when
> the title is obviously Nynorsk.
>
> To continue forever to use no: for BokmÄl and/or RiksmÄl is inherently
> non-neutral. no: is listed in the ISO standard as "Norwegian", yet if
> Nynorsk is disallowed on no: but no: remains at the current subdomain,
> that means we are actually endorsing the view that "BokmÄl is the
> _real_ Norwegian language".
I agree, in principle, but I do hope that we can take his slowly. Both
Wikipedias (with the exception of one user) seem to agree that we should
figure out the best way to create a portal before moving. As long as we
have an open dialogue and continue to move towards a portal solution
(perhaps including also the Swedish and Danish Wikipedias in a
Scandinavian portal), I think that all of us would be better served with
a slightly problematic domain name than with a frustrating half-baked
portal.
The move from no: to nb: with no: as a redirect to nb: could of course
be made straight away, but I fear that this would all to easily become a
permanent solution, and doesn't really fix the problem; no: would still
equal BokmÄl/RiksmÄl.
Chris Nyborg
[[:no:User:Cnyborg]]
Jimmy Wales jwales at wikia.com
Sun May 1 02:09:44 UTC 2005
Previous message: [Wikipedia-l] GFDL works inside other published works
Next message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in the NorwegianWikipedia community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Nyborg wrote:
> I agree, in principle, but I do hope that we can take his slowly.
I agree completely with this part... about taking things slowly. :-)
I would say that the analysis given here was excellent and it made me
really happy to read all about it: this is how Wikipedia works when it
is working best: people who don't agree on everything taking the time to
discuss it at great length and try to find a way to accomodate everyone,
and get a sense of the wisest way forward.
Based on this, I don't support the creation of a 3rd wikipedia unless
and until the users who want it are able to build a consensus within the
community that it is a sensible thing to do.
--Jimbo
Mark Williamson node.ue at gmail.com
Sun May 1 03:07:01 UTC 2005
Previous message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in the NorwegianWikipedia community
Next message: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Date Formats
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm still curious re: Riksmal and Hognorsk.
Mark
Chris Nyborg c-nybor at online.no
Sun May 1 22:24:05 UTC 2005
* Previous message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in the NorwegianWikipedia community
* Next message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in theNorwegianWikipedia community
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org]PĂ„ vegne av Mark Williamson
Sendt: 1. mai 2005 05:07
Til: wikipedia-l at wikimedia.org
Emne: Re: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in
theNorwegianWikipedia community
>I'm still curious re: Riksmal and Hognorsk.
>Mark
Mark, the BokmÄl-Wikipedia includes RiksmÄl. There is an ongoing vote to
decide the name used in language links, which may or may not include
RiksmÄl; no matter how that turns out, RiksmÄl is welcomed.
HĂžgnorsk is still welcomed on nn:; there are only a few hundred users of
HĂžgnorsk, and although one or two of those found their way to Wikipedia,
there hasn't been any contributions in the last months, as far as I can
tell.
I might also add that the accepted policy on no: is to not aggressively go
after articles in Nynorsk and translating them to BokmÄl. In fact, several
contributions have been made in Nynorsk after the new language policy was
decided upon, and no one has been yelling about it. It's more a matter of
having the right to translate them if you're a BokmÄl or RiksmÄl user and
want to work on the articles (ensuring first that the Nynorsk version or a
better version exists at nn:), and to use BokmÄl/RiksmÄl for all article
names and BokmÄl for category names (it's accepted that categories should be
in the majority form, since redirects don't work for categories). If we can
keep things this way, it won't be as much a ban against Nynorsk on no: as a
guarantee that where a Nynorsk article exists at nn:, there can also be a
BokmÄl article at no:.
Chris Nyborg
[[:no:User:Cnyborg]]
Mark Williamson node.ue at gmail.com
Tue May 3 08:05:58 UTC 2005
* Previous message: SV: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in theNorwegianWikipedia community
* Next message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in theNorwegianWikipedia community
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
People have been telling the new contributors about the Nynorsk
Wikipedia, I hope? It would be a shame to have these people donate
heaps of effort writing articles in Nynorsk for no: when they could be
doing it at nn: where they would fit in better.
Mark
On 01/05/05, Chris Nyborg <c-nybor at online.no> wrote:
>
>
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org
> [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org]PĂ„ vegne av Mark Williamson
> Sendt: 1. mai 2005 05:07
> Til: wikipedia-l at wikimedia.org
> Emne: Re: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in
> theNorwegianWikipedia community
>
> >I'm still curious re: Riksmal and Hognorsk.
>
> >Mark
>
> Mark, the BokmÄl-Wikipedia includes RiksmÄl. There is an ongoing vote to
> decide the name used in language links, which may or may not include
> RiksmÄl; no matter how that turns out, RiksmÄl is welcomed.
>
> HĂžgnorsk is still welcomed on nn:; there are only a few hundred users of
> HĂžgnorsk, and although one or two of those found their way to Wikipedia,
> there hasn't been any contributions in the last months, as far as I can
> tell.
>
> I might also add that the accepted policy on no: is to not aggressively go
> after articles in Nynorsk and translating them to BokmÄl. In fact, several
> contributions have been made in Nynorsk after the new language policy was
> decided upon, and no one has been yelling about it. It's more a matter of
> having the right to translate them if you're a BokmÄl or RiksmÄl user and
> want to work on the articles (ensuring first that the Nynorsk version or a
> better version exists at nn:), and to use BokmÄl/RiksmÄl for all article
> names and BokmÄl for category names (it's accepted that categories should be
> in the majority form, since redirects don't work for categories). If we can
> keep things this way, it won't be as much a ban against Nynorsk on no: as a
> guarantee that where a Nynorsk article exists at nn:, there can also be a
> BokmÄl article at no:.
>
> Chris Nyborg
> [[:no:User:Cnyborg]]
>
>
Bjarte SĂžrensen bjarte.sorensen at gmail.com
Tue May 3 08:24:28 UTC 2005
* Previous message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in theNorwegianWikipedia community
* Next message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in theNorwegianWikipedia community
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/05/05, Mark Williamson wrote:
> People have been telling the new contributors about the Nynorsk
> Wikipedia, I hope? It would be a shame to have these people donate
> heaps of effort writing articles in Nynorsk for no: when they could be
> doing it at nn: where they would fit in better.
As long as somebody enters either nn: or no: via the main page, they
cannot really miss the existance of the other. For some months now, we
have, in order to encourage activity on both Norwegian wikipedias, had
the featured articles of the week from the other wikipedia displayed
on the main page, just below the local featured article. The two
Norwegian wikipedias enjoy an excellent diplomatic and productive
relationship, and there is a general feeling of encouragement of
"cross-Norwegian" activity
Indeed, both nn and no are also showing the featured articles of
Swedish and Danish on the main page, thus including all four major
written varieties of Scandinavian language. Also Danish Wikipedia has
followed suit by rotating through the other three wikipedias' featured
articles on a daily basis. Swedish Wikipedia is as of yet not doing
the same. The work of copying across templates (unfortunately one
cannot at this stage use templates from a different implementation of
MediaWiki) is helped by co-ordination through Skanwiki, the
Scandinavian meta-pages. There you can also find a common Scandinavian
Village Pump (Tinget), links to resources valuable to all Scandinavian
encyclopedists, and proposals for other activities that will encourage
activity across the language borders. If you're Scandinavian, and
wants to come by and see for yourself, your warmly welcomed to
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Skanwiki
Cheers,
Bjarte (:meta:User:BjarteSorensen)
Bjarte SĂžrensen bjarte.sorensen at gmail.com
Tue May 3 08:29:46 UTC 2005
* Previous message: SV: [Wikipedia-l] Language policy agreement in theNorwegianWikipedia community
* Next message: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Date Formats
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/05/05, Bjarte SĂžrensen <bjarte.sorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> activity across the language borders. If you're Scandinavian, and
> wants to come by and see for yourself, your warmly welcomed to
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Skanwiki
And of course I want to extend my welcome to Skanwiki also to other
Scandinavian speakers, in Iceland, Greenland, Faeroe Islands and
Finland, as well as other parts of the world.
Regards,
Bjarte
|